Author Archives: Mark Herzer

Leviticus 5:14-6:7, Guilt Offerings

Leviticus 5:14-6:7, Guilt Offerings

This section has three types of sins that require the “guilt offerings” (vv. 15, 19, 6:6) of a ram (vv. 15, 18, 6:6). These offenses seem to be more serious than the sin offerings (5:1-13). How these guilt offerings differed from the previous sin offerings is difficult to understand except these are weightier offenses. The three general types are sins against “the holy things of the Lord” (v. 15), “any of the things that …ought not to be done” (v. 17), and sins against a neighbor’s rights and property (6:2-7).

Of the three, the first sin against holy things and the third type against a neighbor’s property are deemed to be a “breach of faith” (5:14, 6:1). In 6:1-7, the sins are deliberate (one doesn’t rob or lie accidentally) while sins against holy things were “unintentional” (5:14) — yet both are breaches of faith. It probably means that the offenses were very great.

In matters that related to property, a full restoration of the item plus an added 20% compensation fee was required along with the required “guilt offering.” In 5:14-16, the property withheld was probably against the priests (cf. M. Henry).

The three kinds of sin against a neighbor’s property are, deceptive use of a trust or pledge, robbery, and extortion while “swearing falsely” (6:3) about them. These sins against one’s neighbor are deemed to be fundamentally (though not exclusively) “against the Lord” (6:1).

Let me make a few applications from this passage. Let us see the importance of restitution. When it is in our power to restore, we must do all that we can. M. Henry says “we cannot have the comfort of the forgiveness of the sin” if we do not do so. I think some criminal cases would be better served if this principle was applied — have the person pay back the same with an additional amount. The person would learn a valuable lesson. Lastly, we can make no restitution for our sins — our eternal death is required. Praise God, who out of His great mercy, sent His Son to pay the debt we incurred through our sins!

Leviticus 5:1-13, Offerings for Sins of Omission

Leviticus 5:1-13, Offerings for Sins of Omission

The first four verses list four types of offenses or sins of omission. The first verse addresses the man who withholds relevant evidence in a legal matter- called to testify but does not speak (v. 1). The next two verses cover issues of cleanness — touching an unclean animal or carcass (v.2) or touching “human uncleanness” (v. 3) defiled the person — the specifics of these are spelled out in latter chapters (chs. 12-15). Verse 4 deals with the person who made a rash vow.

Verses 5-13 explain the kind of sacrifices required. He must confess it (v. 5) and then make a sin offering for it (v. 6) – the sacrifices either purified the individual (vv. 2, 3) or propitiated God (placating God’s holy wrath). If he could not afford the lamb or goat, he could offer two turtle doves to make atonement for his sins. If he can’t afford these birds, then he can offer a grain offering (“a tenth of an ephah of fine flour for a sin offering” v. 11). To reduce the cost, oil and frankincense for the grain were not required.

Currid helpfully observes that knowledge of the offense does not make one guilty but only enables him to bear the responsibility for the guilt he had incurred before becoming aware of it.

I will make two observations from this passage. One, sin is sin as God defines it. The “cleanness” laws were divinely prescribed. We may not believe it was a big deal in touching an “unclean” animal! A holy God prescribes how he can be approached — that we can approach him is a mercy and prescribing the way to that access is an undeserved kindness.

Two, too often we think God is unreasonable. How foolish we are. God carefully enabled the rich and the poor to deal with their sins — he considered their condition. That he lowered the requirements is a mercy to undeserving sinners. One single offense should have cut us off forever but he condescended to our conditions. Doesn’t this point to the Gospel of our Lord, who became just like us to redeem us? He offers free pardon to the least as well as to the great. The way was costly for God but the way is freely offered to us to find pardon in our Lord for all our sins! The rich and the poor can receive pardon freely in Christ Jesus! We don’t bring the sacrifice; it is God’s sacrifice for our sins!

Leviticus 4, Unintentional Sins

Leviticus 4, Unintentional Sins

This chapter deals with the required sacrifices for “unintentional” sins. Priests (v. 3), the whole congregation (v. 13), leaders (v. 22), the common ordinary Israelite (v. 27) are all bound to offer the specified sacrifices. Everyone sins and has sinned. As one writer said, “Sin does not distinguish between classes of people…It is clear that God does not abandon his people in their sin.” (Currid)

The unintentional sins were those sins committed on account of ignorance or inadvertently. These are distinguished from sins committed “with a high hand” (Num. 15:30) and such a person is to be cut off because “he has despised the word of the Lord and has broken his commandment” (v. 31). Remember, many of these detailed requirements could have been easily overlooked and God recognized their oversight. However, such ignorance, though it mitigated the offense, did not relieve the offender of his guilt.

The priest’s offense affected the whole people (“thus bringing guilt on the people” v. 3) and therefore the largest costly animal was offered, a bull. So serious is the offense, he must take the blood “in the tent of meeting” (a place not permitted for the laypeople) — the blood purified the very border of the Holy of Holies (cf. Currid). The requirements in vv. 8-10 are the same as the peace offerings of chapter 3, except the sacrifice is destroyed and not eaten.

As the priest’s guilt implicated the whole people, so the people’s sins required the elders to act in behalf of the whole people (v. 15) — they acted as the representatives who performed all the required sacrifice for the people who sinned. Like the priest, these elders offered up a bull. This sacrifice made an “atonement” for the people and their sins were “forgiven” (v. 20).

The sins of a “leader” (v. 22) and the common Israelite (v. 27) were less heinous and therefore the sacrifices were not as costly. Because of this, the priest does not enter into the Holy Place to splatter blood because “no defilement has taken place in the sanctuary, and thus there is no need of blood there” (Currid).

Some observations and applications can be made from this passage. Ignorance does not excuse our guilt – it might mitigate it but it still required forgiveness of sins. When it comes to God’s requirements, ignorance is not bliss!

This chapter also shows how seriously God takes our sins, even it was unintentional. Why? Because we did “the things that by the Lord’s commandments ought not to be done” (vv. 13, 27). We might think it is a small thing but it is a true offense because it is against God’s commandments. We sinned against God — our ignorance does not relieve us of our guilt.

Already implied in this exposition is that sin is against God’s command, His Word. However large or small the infraction, it is still defined as a sin because it is against God’s command, His strict requirement. It is called “unintentional sin” but sin nonetheless.

Lastly, let us marvel at the breadth and depth of God’s mercy to us in Christ. His once for all sacrifice for our sins has purchase pardon for all our sins, both intentional and unintentional. So let us freely go to our Heavenly Father and confess them because in the Lord there is forgiveness.

Leviticus 3, Peace Offerings

Leviticus 3, Peace Offerings

This peace or fellowship offering is often voluntary and seems to be accompanied by a sacrificial meal (cf. Deut. 12:7). These sacrifices are very similar to the burnt offerings in ch. 1. Also, like the burnt offerings, the animals are to be offered without blemish. However, peace offerings are not restricted to male animals. Whereas burnt offerings had in mind the removal of sin, these peace offerings we learn from ch. 7, had in mind the people’s thanksgiving, their fellowship with God and their vows and oaths.

The procedure in sacrificing is the same as the burnt offerings of Lev. 1 except only specified parts of the animal are offered in the peace offering. All the fat from the entrails are offered to the Lord since “fat” is considered the best part of the animal while the liver and kidneys were the choice organs of the animal. The purpose was not necessarily to protect the people from heart disease and to lower their cholesterol. Rather, God was to be given the best of the offering. In verse 16 we read, “All fat is the Lord’s.”

The phrase “it is a food offering with a pleasing aroma to the Lord” (v. 5) does not mean God is actually being fed by these offerings and that He needed them to live on. God provides them to his people — remember Acts 17:25, “…nor is he served by human hands, as though he needed anything, since he himself gives to all mankind life and breath and everything.” This offering is figurative and it symbolizes the fellowship they have with God in a meal – as if God were eating with them as they ate before him. In Deut. 27:7 (cf. Deut. 12:12-19; 1 K. 8:64-65), we learn that they were to sacrifice their peace offering and then eat it and rejoice before the Lord their God (Deut. 27:7). Their meal indicated the peace they had with their God. God, the priests, and the offerers all ate a portion of the peace offering.

For us, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ (Rom. 5:1). His sacrifice brought peace and as a result, we have fellowship with God. Even in the Old Covenant, the idea of having peace with God and fellowship with Him was the pinnacle of OT religion. We have that peace and fellowship permanently secured through the once for all sacrifice of our Lord Jesus Christ.

Ergo, this peace is a gift received by faith — we can’t affect it by our works, by our tears, by our resolutions, by our own righteousness, by our religion, by our effort — “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” (Rom. 5:1) If we receive Christ by faith, we will be declared righteous and in turn have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.

Leviticus 2, Grain Offerings

Leviticus 2, Grain Offerings

Unlike the burnt offerings, these grain offerings were not totally consumed by the fire — the priests were allowed to eat it (minus the small portions offered up). “A grain offering is a sacrifice—that is, an offering to the Lord for his utilization—even though it involves no death or blood…”[1]

These grain offerings served as a major food provision for the priests; remember, they did not own land as an inheritance on which they could grow their own crops. The first part (vv. 1-3) dealt with the uncooked grain offering and vv. 4-10 cover cooked grain offering. Most of the cooked grain offerings did not have yeast in them (some did, 7:13; 23:17). They are cooked in a stove or oven, griddle, pan, etc. One writer summarized it this way,

No leaven is to be added to the part presented to the Lord. Since leaven or yeast was a symbol for sin, it was never to be placed upon the altar. Neither was honey to be added because of the danger of fermentation. Salt was mixed into the grain offerings; because it was a preservative, it could arrest any undesirable feature that would be offensive to the Lord.[2]

The “salt of the covenant” is mentioned in v. 13 and every offering presumably had salt in it. The salt of the covenant perhaps pointed to the sign and seal of the covenant between God and His people, as some have noted (cf. Currid; Num. 18:19; 2 Chron. 13:5). “Thus the covenant is made binding by the symbolic use of the salt in the ritual.” (Currid) Another commentator (Burge) suggested that since salt is a preservative, the “salt appropriately signifies the permanence of the covenant (Num. 18:19; 2 Chron. 13:5).”

A “memorial portion” is mentioned in verses 2, 9, and 16. “It may well signify both the worshiper’s remembering of God’s gracious character and gracious acts toward the worshiper and God’s remembering and blessing of the worshiper, for which he or she prayed in the act of offering.”[3]

The last three verses deal in particular with the first fruits gathered during the harvest. Verses 1-3 explained the grain offering throughout the year and these verses deal with the first fruits of the harvest.

In summary, the animal sacrifices in ch. 1 highlighted God’s provision for their sins and these grain offerings highlighted God’s provisions for their sustenance. Note how it started in this chapter — “When anyone brings a grain offering as an offering to the Lord…” (v. 1) These were offered to honor the Lord for His provisions —it was an indication that God had provided for them. These grain offerings were devoted to the Lord from which the priests lived. These were simple yet profound acts because of what they symbolized — Israel recognized that these provisions came from the Lord.

  1. Prayer before our meals recognizes his care and provisions and our thanksgiving is our sacrifice of praise. Our free will offerings on a weekly basis also serves as a offering pleasing to the Lord — this is the way Paul recognized the gifts given to him for his ministry in Thessalonica — “a fragrant offering, a sacrifice acceptable and pleasing to God.” (Phil. 4:18)
  2. As one commentator noted, the grain had to be harvested, turned into fine flour, baked, etc. It was not a simple sacrifice but one that cost them something. They had to prepare it so they could offer it. Let us spend some time preparing our sacrifices of prayer, praise and thanksgiving each and every day through the merit of our Lord Jesus Christ, especially on the Lord’s Day!

[1] Gary M. Burge and Andrew E. Hill, eds., The Baker Illustrated Bible Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 2012), 93.

[2] Louis Goldberg, “Leviticus,” in Evangelical Commentary on the Bible, vol. 3, Baker Reference Library (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House, 1995), 72.

[3] Earl D. Radmacher, Ronald Barclay Allen, and H. Wayne House, Nelson’s New Illustrated Bible Commentary (Nashville: T. Nelson Publishers, 1999), 155.

Leviticus 1:3-17

Leviticus 1:3-17, Burnt Offerings of bulls, goats, and birds

These verses cover the three types of the same sacrifice, a burnt offering (vv. 3, 10, 14) – a whole offering completely burned to ashes (the word means to ascend, go up as in the smoke of the sacrifice going up to God). The donor offers up a bull from the “herd” (v. 5), or a sheep or goat from the “flock” (v. 10), or an “offering of birds” (v. 14) — they are listed according to their value, the most expensive and costly to the least. That is why the sections start of with “IF” — options according to their abilities were presented to them. This offering is “to the Lord” (v. 2) and performed “before the Lord” (vv. 3, 11). Most likely the bull as well as the animal from the flock and one’s birds were all offered on the “north side of the altar” (v. 11).

The sacrifice makes atonement (“covers over”) for the offerer (v. 4). The laying on of his hand on the head of the “of the burnt offering” (v. 4) means the animal served as his substitute.[1] “He lays his hand upon the animal’s head, indicating that it is his substitute as well as his own property, and that he is giving of himself symbolically in the ritual.” (Tyndale) The ritual means either a transference of guilt or simply an identification of the one offering the animal.

Flaying (v. 6) the animal allowed the priest to keep the hide (Lev. 7:8, “The priest who offers a burnt offering for anyone may keep its hide for himself.”) and the cutting them most likely enabled the sacrifices to burn completely through. The collected blood (v. 5) was dashed against the altar. It is probably the worshipper who probably had to slaughter and flay the animal.

When offered according to God’s prescription, the sacrifice would be “a pleasing aroma to the Lord” (vv. 9, 13, 17). Some have suggested that male animals were more expendable since the females would be able to replenish the herd and flock – this was a kindness to them.[2]

The NT makes it clear that the blood of these animals did not in and of themselves cleanse them from their sins: “For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.” (Heb. 10:4) Those sacrifices looked forward to the ultimate sacrifice which is Christ, the perfect lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world. In Eph. 5:2 we read that Christ “gave himself up for us, a fragrant offering and sacrifice to God.”

Let me apply two important truths to us:

  1. Let us marvel at the costly sacrifice. These offerings came from their herds and flocks — their property. It cost them something. Wild undomesticated animals would have cost them nothing. The animals had to be unblemished (vv. 3, 10)- the best of the animals. However, we have a debt we cannot pay but our Lord paid it in our behalf with His own life. So we read, “You are not your own, for you were bought with a price. So glorify God in your body.” (1 Cor. 6:19, 20) God paid our debt with the death of His Son. Let us gratefully respond by glorifying God with our lives!
  2. Secondly, though we no longer sacrifice animals to satisfy divine justice, we are taught from Mk. 12:33 this simple truth, “And to love him [God] with all the heart and with all the understanding and with all the strength, and to love one’s neighbor as oneself, is much more than all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices.” We do this in response to the once for all sacrifice of the Lord Jesus which secured our pardon and salvation. In response, endeavor to keep the two great commandments out of gratitude!

[1] This practice is common and abundant examples will be found in chs. 3 & 4.

[2] Males were also considered to be of higher value in that culture.

CCPC Reading Groups

Here is the reading schedule for the next several months! Outlines of each reading section will be provided on the day we meet. Please try to read as much as you can. If you cannot read all the material, show up anyway because you can still learn from the outline and discussion. DV, we’ll meet after lunch, around 3PM or so.

CCPC Reading Groups, 2018

CGG                                                                           CCC

Christian Growth Group                                            Christian Classics Club

1St Sunday of the Month                                              3rd Sunday of the Month

 

William Gurnall                                                          Wilhelmus a’Brakel

The Christian in Complete Armour                       The Christian’s Reasonable Service

3 Vols. (Abridged) BOT                                             4 Vols. (Unabridged) RHB

 

Feb.                                                                             Feb.

1:23-58                                                                            1:3-46

 

 

March                                                                         March

1:59-93                                                                             1:46-81

 

 

April                                                                          April

1:93-123                                                                         1:83-138

 

 

May                                                                            May

1:124-161                                                                        1:139-191

 

 

June                                                                            June

1:161-1867                                                                       1:193-250

 

 

July                                                                            July

1:186-219                                                                       1:251-303

 

 

Aug.                                                                            Aug.

1:219-247                                                                        1:307-354

Leviticus 1:1-2

Leviticus 1:1-2, Introduction[1]

The first book the children of the synagogue used to read and study was Leviticus. Admittedly, it is probably the last book NT believers will want to read. But it is part of the inspired book of the Bible and therefore instructive. It will be difficult since we do not have corresponding practices to most of these things.

The name “Leviticus” is a Latin word which essentially means that this is about things related to the Levite (Levitical). It is more about priests than Levites but it is the name we have settled upon.

We ended our reading of Exodus with the final erection of the Tabernacle and this became the place where God would meet His people. Leviticus gives us the instructions regarding how God is to be worshipped and approached. The book rarely includes historical narratives (though it includes a well known incident of Nadab and Abihu); it is almost entirely legislative or prescriptive — it tells Israel what they are to do!

Following John Currid, Leviticus has six major sections which he calls “manuals.” Prescriptions for Israel and their sacrifices are found in 1:1-6:7. Prescriptions regarding the sacrifices for the priesthood is covered in 6:8-7:38. The codes regarding cleanliness is found in 11:1-15:33. The fourth section in ch. 16 deals with the Day of Atonement. The fifth section is the largest and it prescribes rules regarding holiness and ritual purity. Chapters 17-26 presents the numerous cases on how they should be holy and pure. The sixth section found in the last chapter deals with the funding of the sanctuary.

We must remember that Israel did not offer up these offerings (v.2) or sacrifices as human initiatives and attempts to appease and manipulate God — these were divinely initiated and ordered. They were responses of redeemed people following God’s prescriptions.

Finally, I quote 26:46, the section dealing with holiness and purity, “These are the statutes and rules and laws that the LORD made between himself and the people of Israel through Moses on Mount Sinai.” God gave all these specific prescriptions on Mount Sinai to Moses which he faithfully recorded. Hear Andrew Bonar’s (1842) words:

‘There is no book, in the whole compass of that inspired Volume which the Holy Ghost has given us, that contains more of the very words of God than Leviticus. It is God that is the direct speaker in almost every page; His gracious words are recorded in the form wherein they were uttered. This consideration cannot fail to send us to the study of it with singular interest and attention.’

Since all this was given by God, let us conclude by remembering this. Our God graciously (I underscore this) prescribed these statutes so that His people can have ongoing fellowship with Him. In God’s infinite holiness, he could have simply rejected them entirely since they were sinful but in His mercy He accommodated himself to these rules anticipating the perfect sacrifice His Son would offer, even our Lord Jesus Christ. Through that one sacrifice to which the entire book points to, we have access and fellowship with God!

[1] Though I will be using various commentaries and Study Bibles for this exposition, I will lean heavily on John Currid’s fantastic commentary on Leviticus in the EP Study Commentary series.

John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, A Study Guide, Lesson 11

STUDY SESSION 11

Introduction (pp. 145-154)

Christian and Hopeful come to Beulah land and then enter the gates of the celestial city. Their death before entering heaven and their struggles with their own personal failures also come to light.

 

Readers

Narrator (145) – does most of the reading

Gardener (146-7) — a few lines

Christian & Hopeful have very little apart from the summary statements made by the narrator.

Shining ones, Heavenly Host, etc. — several lines here and there

 

Vocabulary

“Beulah” (145 †) — “married” in Hebrew [from Isaiah 62:4, “but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the LORD delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married.”]

 

Questions (pp. 145-154)

Page #

145      What do you think the “Country of Beulah” represents?

146      Explain the “pangs” or sickness that overcame Christian and Hopeful.

147      What does the river represent? How is the depth (148) dependent upon the Pilgrim’s faith? (“You shall find it deeper or shallower, as you believe in the King of the place.”)

148      What frightened Christian as he crossed the river?

153-4   Ignorance comes up again. What was his problem? How did he get across the river of death? Explain what “Vain-hope a Ferry-man” represented.

154      Why is this sentence so important, “Then I saw that there was a way to Hell, even from the Gates of Heaven, as well as from the City of Destruction.” (154)

 

Observations & Notes

BEULAH (145)

Bunyan seems to view Beulah as those last sweet peaceful moments some believers face before their death. What he says of this place is remarkable: “…this was beyond the Valley of the shadow of death, and also out of the reach of Giant Despair; neither could they from this place so much as see Doubting Castle.” (146) It is a scent of heaven before entering heaven (“…within the sight of the City they were going to”). It is “almost a suburb of heaven” (Horner, 273) or the “foretastes of heaven as we draw near to the River of Death” (Cheever, 454) — Bunyan calls it “the Borders of Heaven” (146). Not all believers experience this but some do. (cf. Thomas Scott, 202-3)

Horner takes this to mean the kind of pastoral ministry ministers utilize to comfort senior saints as they prepare for death (Horner, 74, 274). His interpretation seems to make sense of the experience but it could simply be the comforting grace many believers receive before they die.

FELL SICK (146)

This is considered spiritual love sickness. At times mystical in character, such language characterized the Puritan way of viewing the Song of Solomon. The love of the bride represented the love of the Saint/church for Christ. Thomas Scott explained “sick of love” in these words: “In the immediate view of heavenly felicity, Paul ‘desired’ to depart hence and be with Christ, as far better than life; and David ‘fainted for God’s salvation.’ In the lively exercise of holy affections, the believer grows weary of this sinful world; and longs to have his faith changed for sight, his hope swallowed up in enjoyment, and his love perfected, and secured from all interruption and abatement.” (203)

YOU MUST OBTAIN IT BY YOUR OWN FAITH (147)

Each man must die on his own; he alone can cross the river and go to the gates of the celestial city. There is no proxy dying. A king and a pauper must both cross the river on their own and each shall obtain salvation as he looks in faith to Christ.

VAIN-HOPE (153-154)

“Vain-hope ever dwells in the bosom of fools, and is ever ready to assist Ignorance. He wanted him at the last, and he found him. He had been his companion through life, and will not forsake him in the hour of death. You see Ignorance had no bands in his death, no fears, doubts, and sorrows, no terror from the enemy, but all was serene and happy. Vain-hope was his ferryman, and he, as the good folk say, died like a lamb: ah ! but did such lambs see what was to follow, when Vain-hope had wafted them over the river — they would roar like lions!” (Mason, 190)

FUMBLED IN HIS BOSOM (154)

He was supposed to present his certificate. He did not have one. He willfully resisted all the gospel teaching he received and believed it will fare well with him. “His final fumbling for a certificate that he does not have represents Ignorance searching his heart for a faith that he never possessed. Ignorance stands for the cool, skeptical modern person who wants to ground his or her faith in conscience and conduct, not in the grace of God to an unworthy sinner.” (Calhoun, 78)

A WAY TO HELL, EVEN FROM THE GATES OF HEAVEN (154)

Some unacquainted with genuine saving grace die composed and assured of their salvation. But their faith is delusional. “But what do they prove? What evidence is there, that such men are saved? Is it not far more likely that they continued to the end under the power of ignorance and self-conceit; that Satan took care not to disturb them; and that God gave them over to a strong delusion, and left them to perish with a lie in their right hand? Men, who have neglected religion all their lives, or have habitually for a length of years disgraced an evangelical profession, being when near death visited by pious persons, sometimes obtain a sudden and extraordinary measure of peace and joy, and die in this frame. This should in general be considered as a bad sign: for deep humiliation, yea distress, united with some trembling hope in God’s mercy through the gospel, is far more suited to their case, and more likely to be the effect of spiritual illumination.” (Thomas Scott, 211)

 

THE END

John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, A Study Guide, Lesson 10

STUDY SESSION 10

Introduction (pp. 137-145)

            Christian and Hopeful discourse about good spiritual matters. Hopeful gave a wonderful account of the Lord’s dealings with his soul. Ignorance is also invited to the conversation and his misunderstanding of God’s method of justifying sinners comes to light. After this, they discuss how or why a man would end up turning away from the faith.

 

Readers

Narrator (137) — not much

Christian (137) — a good amount

Hopeful (140) — not as much as Christian but a fair amount

Ignorance (137) — a good amount

 

Vocabulary

tro (137; 40, 69) = trow (believe, think)

Halter (145) = noose, a rope for hanging criminals

 

Questions (pp. 137-145)

Page #

137-8   How does ignorance come to believe he is going to heaven? Does he believe God’s judgment of his sinfulness? Can a person be a Christian and not have the same judgment on this matter? Explain.

140      What is justification? Ignorance says he believes in it. Does he? Is anything wrong with his view? How does he respond to Christian’s explanation of what justifying faith is?

140-1   Explain the point Hopeful and Christian were trying to make regarding a need for “revelation”?

142-3   Christian and Hopeful discourse about right and godly fear. They talk about conviction of sin. What purpose does a conviction of sin serve before one comes to Christ?

143-4   In their journey, they talk about Temporary,[1] Turnback, and Save-self. Mr. Temporary’s own backsliding is rehearsed. Four reasons are given for the backsliding into hell. What are they (put them into your own words as best as you can)?

145      Christian also describes what happens once those four reasons for backsliding occur. Explain why #1 is #1. Also, explain how #1 leads to #2. Explain why #5 works. What advantage is there in doing such a thing?

 

Observations & Notes

WOULD LOOSEN THE REINES OF OUR LUST (140)

Ignorance’s response indicates that he understood what Christian was saying. He draws a different (and wrong) conclusion. Ignorance believed that if we looked solely to Christ for justification, then what we do would not matter at all. He is saying that Christian’s view of justification would lead to licentiousness (or antinomianism – “lawlessness”).

All unbelievers believe the same; the wonderful doctrine of justification, if rightly preached, always prompts Rom. 6:1, “What shall we say then? Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound?” or Rom. 3:31, “Do we then overthrow the law by this faith?”

Neonomians in Bunyan’s time along with Roman Catholics all responded as ignorance did in reaction to the biblical view of justification by faith. Many modern Protestants do not understand this glorious doctrine and would find ignorance’s own view to be theirs.

AWAKENED (143)

This is not a word we use very often. It was a common word in Bunyan’s time and a generation of two after. It denotes the experience of sinner who has been arrested by conviction and alarmed by his predicament through the preaching of the Gospel. The question for most of them was over how deep the awakening went. Did it issue in new life or did it only issue in a shallow temporary faith? Too often, people confuse awakening with conversion. One could be awakened and not converted.

SUDDAIN BACKSLIDING (143)

This is a reference to apostasy. Depending on how one defines backslide, Bunyan has in mind the ultimate backsliding, namely, the falling away from the faith (apostasy). Christians can stumble and slide back for a season but their recovery alone will show that it was a set back and not a final fall.

FOUR REASONS (143-145)

Christian explains how a person can come under conviction and yet turn away from the Lord.

  1. The conscience is awakened but the mind is not changed. Like a man feeling guilty because he was caught, he intends to mend his ways. Once the “danger” of being caught, exposed, implicated, etc. passes away, then the guilt recedes. When this happens, his religion disappears. Fear must not be the only motivation.
  2. Once the fear recedes, the fear of man dominates. They don’t want to be too religious and hazard everything (trying to be “wise” about all this).
  3. Once the sense of Hell abates, their sense of shame increases — shame of religion.
  4. They don’t like to see their guilt and sense their misery.

NINE STEPS TO APOSTASY (144-145)

“See how gradually, step by step, apostates go back. It begins in the unbelief of the heart, and ends in open sins in the life. Why is the love of this world so forbidden? why is covetousness call idolatry? Because, whatever draws away the heart from God, and prevents enjoying close fellowship with him, naturally tends to apostasy from him. Look well to your hearts and affections. Daily learn to obey that command, ‘Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life.’ (Prov. iv. 23) If you neglect to watch, you will be sure to smart — under the sense of sin on earth, or its curse in hell. ‘See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise, redeeming the time, because the days are evil.’ (Eph. v. 15, 16)” (Mason, 179)

[1] “Temporary was doctrinally acquainted with the gospel, but a stranger to its sanctifying power. Such men have been forward in religion, but that is now past; for they were always graceless, and came short of honesty in their profession, if not in their moral conduct, and were ever ready to turn back into the world as convenient season.” (T. Scott, 199)