Intinction

Intinction[1]

Some Presbyterians and many high liturgists have resorted to intinction in the Lord’s Supper. Intinction was a minority practice in the early church in which the consecrated bread was dipped into the wine. The bread was often served on a spoon to prevent the possibility of dropping or dripping the elements.

The Eastern Church appears to practice this. On the other hand, the Western church has quite uniformly resisted this. Julius I (337-352) forbad this practice because he believed it was not biblical. The first Council of Braga (675) also decreed against it. Pope Urban II (1088-1099) similarly prohibited it except in cases of necessity and so did his successor Pascal II (1099-1118). The Convocation of Canterbury (1175) similarly condemned the practice. The Western church has always opposed this practice. A few however, tried to argue for its practice. Rolandus of Bologna (a twelfth century divine) argued pragmatically that it was easier to serve a larger congregation.

The reason why intinction should be permitted, according to Roland, is that it is an easier way to administer communion than by the host and chalice separately. The fear of dropping the host, or of accidentally spilling the contents of the chalice, he notes, may make some communicants anxious. This anxiety may undercut the proper state of devotion and receptivity which they need to bring to the sacrament. Their worry, indeed, may keep them away from communion altogether. And so, for practical pastoral reasons (curis secularibus) intinction should be allowed.[2]

The Western church did not believe that both elements were necessary (contra communio sub utroque specie = communion under both kinds, that is, both the bread and wine were required in order to have communion). Intinction also ran afoul against the growing doctrine of concomitance (which taught “that Christ exists wholly in each of the elements, so that those who receive the consecrated host, partake of his blood no less than of his body.”)[3] This theory of course assumes the doctrine of transubstantiation. So the Western church argued for communion sub una specie. She has consistently prohibited the practice of intinction.

When we read the Bible, we find that only one person received the sacrament by intinction (if we count it as such), i.e., Judas: “It is one of the twelve, one who is dipping bread into the dish with me.” (Mk. 14:20) But the practice appears to be unique to the institution. In Mark, the words of institution came after the dipping.

In Mark 14:22, Jesus blessed and broke the bread and said, “Take; this is my body.” It is a separate act to v. 23 which says, “And he took a cup, and when he had given thanks he gave it to them, and they all drank of it.” They did not eat of the cup but drank from it. Eating and drinking are separate acts. The commands are to eat (Mt. 26:26, “Take, eat”) and to drink (“Drink of it, all of you.” Mt. 26:27). The practice of intinction therefore cannot comply with our Lord’s words of institution.



[1] [This short post is taken from my lectures notes on ecclesiology. Some have asked me about this practice in our denomination so I have uploaded my preliminary thoughts on the topic.] References used for this are the following: McClintock and Strong’s Cyclopedia of Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Literature; A Catholic Dictionary, ed. Donald Attwater; Schaff’s History of the Christian Church; Hagenbach’s History of Doctrines; various theological reference works. Other related concepts are “concomitance” and communio sub utroque specie, etc.

[2] Marcia L. Colish, Peter Lombard (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1994), 570.

[3] Hagenbach’s History of Doctrines, § 195.

Proverbs 3:1-12

Proverbs 3:1-12

3:1-4 — My son, do not forget my teaching, but let your heart keep my commandments, 2 for length of days and years of life and peace they will add to you. 3 Let not steadfast love and faithfulness forsake you; bind them around your neck; write them on the tablet of your heart. 4 So you will find favor and good success in the sight of God and man.

Wisdom’s teaching must be kept by the heart ( ^B<)li); God’s commandment must be obeyed from the heart (v. 1). The commandments here (torah) are inclusive of God’s revealed will but in the context, it is probably focused on parental (father’s 1:8) instructions (cf. mother’s 1:8). “They had a binding quality to them because they were based on the teachers’ God-fearing observations of how life under divine control really worked.” (Hubbard)

Both verses 2 & 4 promise blessings to those who obey. Long and peaceful life (v. 2) and favor and success with God and men are promised. Favor is “the positive disposition of heaven and earth toward the son because of his attractiveness.” (Waltke)

Verse 3 commends us to write these things on our hearts. The “steadfast love and faithfulness” are probably another way of speaking about the teaching and commandments of v. 1.  They are “the essence of the father’s commands.” (Waltke) So, we cultivate these commands internally (heart, v. 1) and externally (around your neck, v. 3).

So, as we heed God’s instruction (and parent’s), we are promised peace. That is not to say that we will be entirely free from trouble (since some men hate righteousness and persecute them) but instead, a life that avoids the afflictions of the wicked will bode better than those who disobey. “The wicked indeed live long, and the godly often ‘live out only half his days.’ The wicked die in outward comfort, the righteous in outward trouble. But length of days is the promise to the righteous — whether for earth or for heaven, as their Father deems fittest for them.” (Bridges) “The godly shall enjoy life as far as it is really a blessing in their particular circumstances, and the meaning carried beyond this would convert the blessing into a threatening. Peace is enjoyed by the godly, even that peace of God which passeth all understanding, and it keeps their hearts and minds through Jesus Christ. Outward prosperity is enjoyed by them, as far as it is consistent with their spiritual interests.” (Lawson)

 

3:5-8 — 5 Trust in the LORD with all your heart, and do not lean on your own understanding. 6 In all your ways acknowledge him, and he will make straight your paths. 7 Be not wise in your own eyes; fear the LORD, and turn away from evil. 8 It will be healing to your flesh and refreshment to your bones.

The words “trust” and “lean” (not incline) are very close to each other. Lean is “support yourself”, that is rely upon. In this context, we are called upon to obey the instructions of wisdom (vv. 1-4) and to rely on God and not our own understanding. That means, when we seek to obey God, there are times we wonder if obedience is proper or if it will prosper. “They are confident that as they fulfill their obligations, he will uphold his in his own time and in his own way, even when the wicked prosper and the righteous suffer (cf. 14:26; 16:23, 20; 18:10; 19:23; 28:25; 29:25; 30:1-14).” (Waltke) It is a trust that is whole-hearted.

Too often our understanding is the rule and guide. If God’s way comports with our understanding, with our outlook, then we will trust Him so far as we understand. “One is a fool to rely on his thimble of knowledge before its vast ocean or on his own understanding, which is often governed by irrational urges that he cannot control (26:5, 12, 16; 28:26a; esp. 30:1-6; Job 38:4-5).” (Waltke) “Dependence on our own wisdom, will lead us from trusting in God, to make lies our refuge, and to adopt unhallowed means for the attainment of our wishes.” (Lawson)

Of course, our understanding that is guided and filled with God’s commands is an entirely different thing. This understanding will see the wisdom of trusting in God and relying on His ways.

In verse 6, “acknowledge” means “know” — know (be aware of) God in all your ways. “If you know…God in your paths, then you will certainly be on the right ones.” (Longman) By trusting in God exclusively, we will know Him, we will be aware of Him in all our doings. As we become aware of God and His will in all our ways, then he will make straight your paths, that is, God will make sure that good will ultimately be accomplished. (Note, “One has to view the course of one’s life from a bird’s-eye view, not from a worm’s-eye view, to see this truth.”)

Verse 7 reiterates v. 5. To trust in the Lord and not relying on our own understanding means to not be wise in our own eyes but instead to fear God by turning away from all that is evil (cf., 12:15, “The way of a fool is right in his own eyes, but a wise man listens to advice.”). Ultimately, human wisdom that is not filled with God’s wisdom leads to evil. We must never be wise in our own eyes.

In so doing, we will have peace. Some draw a physical principle from v. 8: “By an eternal law the moral condition and the physical are linked together; the mens sana promotes the corpus sanum.” (Perowne)[1] But as some have noted, the physical imagery points to the metaphoric truth. “In sum, a right relationship with God leads to a state of complete physical and mental well-being, not simply to the absence of illness and disease.” (Waltke) “Health is a wholistic not just a physical word; it connotes thriving and radiant wellness…” (Hubbard)

 

3:9, 10 — 9 Honor the LORD with your wealth and with the firstfruits of all your produce; 10 then your barns will be filled with plenty, and your vats will be bursting with wine.

These two verses may appear to some to be out of place. The father’s instruction to his son is about wisdom, fearing God, obeying his commands, etc. What does this have to do with money? Yet, the presence of these verses reveal the mind of God. Wisdom, practical wisdom, in the life of the godly, is intimately connected with his use of wealth. In effect, wisdom is demonstrated in our use of mammon.

Honoring the Lord with our wealth is an act of worship. That is the context in which this occurs. [2] The firstfruits are reminiscent of Deut. 26:2, 10 (2 you shall take some of the first of all the fruit of the ground, which you harvest from your land that the LORD your God is giving you, and you shall put it in a basket, and you shall go to the place that the LORD your God will choose, to make his name to dwell there. 10 And behold, now I bring the first of the fruit of the ground, which you, O LORD, have given me.’ And you shall set it down before the LORD your God and worship before the LORD your God:) It usually means the “best of material things” (Waltke).[3]

Verse 10 is like the other verses above. In response, God will bless if we trust Him wholeheartedly and obey His instructions. Even in the realm of our wealth, God will bless as He deems best. “Your vats…refer to several such pools or tubs. The yield of juice envisioned here is so great that several collecting pools will be needed for the wine, which was produced without trampling! Will overflow… means that it will break out of the confining rock tub. The Creator rewards the true worshiper more than hundredfold (Mal. 3:10-12; Mark 10:29-30).” (Waltke) In honoring the Lord with our wealth, we will not lack. As Paul says to those Philippians who supplied him with what he needed, “And my God will supply every need of yours according to his riches in glory in Christ Jesus.” (Phil. 4:19)

“One can show they have the proper attitude toward Yahweh, in trusting (v. 5) and fearing him (v. 7), if they are willing to give up some of their wealth.” (Longman) “This is the rule of sacrifice— a costly precept to the worldling and the formalist. But to the servant of God, is it not a privilege to lay aside a portion of substance with this sacred stamp, ‘This is for God?’” (Bridges)

1. True wisdom, true fear of God, is demonstrated by honoring the Lord with our wealth.

2. This is particularly true for the young son in view. The youthful one, the naïve one, must show his fear of God by honoring Him with his own wealth. Giving to the Lord’s cause is not a “grown up’s” duty but the activity of all the godly. Isn’t this one of the first practical tests for a young lady or man? How will he view his or her newfound wealth? They’ve not seen this much money before. Will he horde it? Spend it on himself? Will he give grudgingly or sparingly? Will it be the firstfruits or only what remains after he spends on everything he wants? Will he really trust the Lord on this matter?

3. Verse 10 is the answer to those who argue that they cannot give to the Lord because they so need it. They must trust him and not lean on their own understanding. Quite often, heaven’s math differs from our checkbook. (not encouraging irresponsibility)

4. There are no exceptions in these verses. It is a call given to all who want to be wise in the Lord.

 

3:11, 12 — 11 My son, do not despise the LORD’s discipline or be weary of his reproof, 12 for the LORD reproves him whom he loves, as a father the son in whom he delights.

We understand the reproof of parents but these verses speak of the Lord’s discipline (cf. Heb. 12:5-6). Perfect obedience is impossible and our hearts are not earnest as they ought to be. The Lord out of love for us disciplines us. We are not to “despise” or “be weary” of his discipline. Some endure but despise God in return though they may never say so. Despise and be weary contradict trust and rely in v. 5.

Waltke says, “When the father’s admonitions are violated, the son can expect the LORD to back it up with a ‘spanking’ to prevent the wrong from becoming habitual.”  The discipline is corrective, pedagogical, reformative, etc. and not punitive.  “As the loving Father, God desires the son to experience the blessings of the even verses, but the condition to realizing this goal is satisfying the obligations of the odd verses. Therefore, he imposes discipline on the son to conform him to its obligations and so proves his love. The absence of corrective measures… would indicate rejection.” (Waltke, summarizing W. Lane)


[1] Translated, “the sane mind promotes the healthy body.”

[2] “How would one honor Yahweh with one’s wealth? Though it does not specify, it would seem likely that we are talking here of turning over a portion of one’s wealth and produce to the temple officials who collect the tithe.” (Longman)

[3] “Unless the son pours on his ‘sacrifice’ the incense of love, trust, and devotion, as seen by offering the best, it is not acceptable to the LORD, as Cain should have learned (Gen. 4:2-7).” (Waltke)

The Larger Catechism, #2

The Larger Catechism

Question 2

2.         Q. How doth it appear that there is a God?

A. The very light of nature in man, and the works of God, declare plainly that there is a God;[3] but his word and Spirit only do sufficiently and effectually reveal him unto men for their salvation.[4]

Scriptural Defense and Commentary

[3] Romans 1:19-20. Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath showed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse. Psalm 19:1-3. The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament showeth his handiwork. Day unto day uttereth speech, and night unto night showeth knowledge. There is no speech nor language, where their voice is not heard. Acts 17:28. For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring. [4] 1 Corinthians 2:9-10. But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him. But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God. 2 Timothy 3:15-17. And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works. Isaiah 59:21. As for me, this is my covenant with them, saith the LORD; My spirit that is upon thee, and my words which I have put in thy mouth, shall not depart out of thy mouth, nor out of the mouth of thy seed, nor out of the mouth of thy seed’s seed, saith the LORD, from henceforth and for ever.

Regarding the letter to the Romans, Shedd says this: “It is sometimes forgotten that the introductory part of this Epistle contains the fullest and clearest account ever yet given, of man’s moral and religious nature, and his innate knowledge of God and law. There is no deeper psychology, and no better statement of natural religion, than that in the first and second chapters.”[1] He rightly recognized that Romans teaches us that a knowledge of God is clearly available to us. The first two chapters teach us much about the kind of theological knowledge all men possess.

The Bible teaches us that both internally and externally, the created world declares that God exists. Internally, that is, in our constitution, God has written a knowledge of Himself.[2] In Rom. 2:14-16, we are taught that God’s righteous requirements are written in our hearts: “the work of the law is written on their hearts” (v. 15).  Also, Rom. 1:19 states “that which may be known of God is manifest in them” (KJV).[3] Calvin and most of the traditional interpreters have taken it to be “in them.” However, the two verses are not the same. In Rom. 2:15, it suggests that God’s moral law is within them and in 1:19, the knowledge of God is in them because of the knowledge of God evident around them (“within them…to them,” NASB).[4] It is in us because it is evident around us. God’s created order plainly manifests His being.

Several things can be observed from Rom. 1 and 2. First of all, the knowledge of God is universal (v. 18). Verse 18 clearly has in mind all of humanity “all ungodliness and unrighteousness.” It is not for the few and the intelligent; all human beings are given this knowledge. The pagan, in a remote part of Africa, as well as the pagan in an extremely secular region of America, are both recipients of this knowledge. Secondly, it is God-authored. “God” has made it known (v. 19): “because God has shown it to them” (ὁ θεὸς γὰρ αὐτοῖς ἐφανέρωσεν). God is the subject of this sentence and the dispenser of this knowledge—He ensures that it gets to us. “The clause guards against any notion that people have access to true knowledge of God through their natural capacities.”[5] Thirdly, it is perspicuous or clear/plain (v. 19). We are told that God made it “plain” (φανερόν) to or in us and that He has manifested or shown (ἐφανέρωσεν) it to us (the same word translated differently). God is not playing a game here; the knowledge of God is clearly before us. This knowledge of Himself is not murky or cryptic; we may have shut our eyes against it but that does not lessen its clarity. This is more forcefully seen in v. 20 when Paul says that the things of God “have been clearly perceived” (νοούμενα καθορᾶται). Fourthly, it is accurate or true (vv. 18, 25). The knowledge man suppresses is the “truth” (τὴν ἀλήθειαν, v. 18). What is known is true; it is not a false general knowledge of a god— it is the unmistakable knowledge of Himself. In v. 25, we are told that humanity once again exchanged “the truth of God” for a lie. What is known or perceived is the genuine truth.  Fifthly, it is the real God and not a god (or, it is theistic and not deistic) that is known and suppressed. God is making HIMSELF known (v. 19); He is not declaring a knowledge of a “god” that is vague. Our God is impressing a knowledge of Himself into the very fabric of His creation.    Sixthly, it is more than mere existence (v. 20). It is not a bare existence of the true God that is known. Enough is made known to recognize His “invisible attributes.” Paul lists God’s “eternal power” (by the sheer vastness and extensiveness of the creation) and His “divine nature” (only a God could have created this universe). Evolution (the theory without God) is the deliberate attempt to hide this simple fact—viz., that the complex created world somehow sprang into existence by chance. Only God could have created such a complex world.  We must also notice what Paul teaches us regarding the true God. God’s attributes (what some call, his involuntary attributes) are evident (power, justice [from God’s wrath, v. 18], etc.) but not his attribute of mercy (his voluntary attributes).  Seventhly, it is authoritative (v. 19, 2:15, 16).[6] God is the one revealing Himself and God is the one addressing our consciences.  His clear declaration and conviction in our consciences are authoritative, that is, He binds men to what He has so clearly revealed. The revelation is not a suggestion but an authoritative declaration of His person, character, and will.  Lastly, it is sufficient (v. 20).  God has made enough of Himself known to hold men inexcusable. Man cannot presume to play the pseudo-intellectual game, “Well, I do not think there is sufficient evidence to prove one way or the other. I am agnostic.” It is not sufficient enough to save man but sufficient enough to condemn him. Continue reading

John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, A Study Guide, Lesson 3

STUDY SESSION 3

Introduction (pp. 41-55)

Christian will meet with false professors as well as good brethren in the faith. In this study, Christian will encounter the Porter and the Beautiful House.

 

Readers

Narrator (41) – large amount of reading

Christian (42)

“there came one to him” (42) – one line

Timorous (42) – very small amount

Mistrust (42) – very small amount

Porter named “Watchful” (45, 53)

Discretion (48) – short

Piety (48) – a good amount

Prudence (50) – a page

Charity (51) – almost two pages

 

Vocabulary

amain (42) = with all your strength (adv.)

chid (44) = chided, scolded, rebuked

benighted (45) = in a pitiful condition or overtaken by darkness

doleful (45) = woeful, sorrowful, sad, etc.

ake (49) = ache

conversation (52) = this word often means one’s lifestyle, behavior

accoutred (55) = clothed or equipped

 

Questions (pp. 41-55)

Page #

41        Must every believer climb up the hill (Difficulty)? Why or why not? What if the person says that he has not met with any difficulties? (see Lions†)

42        What is Bunyan saying when he mentions that the “Roll fell out of his hand”? What was the lesson in this incident (44)? What does the loss of the Roll represent?

44        What is “sinful sleep”? [“He that sleeps is a loser.” 42]

48        What does this [Beautiful] “House” represent?

50        Christian said that he had “much shame and detestation” when he thought about the Countrey he left. Is this the experience of all true Christians? What if the overall (secret) tendency and affection is to yearn for that Countrey? What does this show? (see Observations and Notes)

50        Prudence asks about the country Christian left and wondered he still had remnants of that country in him (“Do you not yet beat away with you some of the things that then you were conversant withal?). What was his answer and what does it illustrate?

50        How does Christian get strength to fight his inner corruptions? What are the “Golden Hours”?

51-2     Explain what Christian means when he says, “I know also that a man by his conversation, may soon overthrow what by argument or perswasion he doth labour to fasten upon others for their good.”

52        What do you suppose the “supper” represented?

53        What do you think the “Study” represents? What happened in the study?

54        Christian is led into the “Armory.” Again, what do you think this represents? Do all Christians avail themselves of this? How is the “Armory” related to the “Study”?

 

Observations & Notes

LIONS (42)

Unlike our generation, many believers were jailed for their convictions. Baptists and other Non-Conformists did not follow the Church of England or the established church of the land. They were not allowed to preach or meet without conforming to the religion of the land (that is why some of them “Pilgrims” went to America and Holland). Bunyan most likely was referring to the civil and ecclesiastical powers that vexed him and other believers.

However, on p. 45 we read: “fear not the Lions, for they are Chained; and are placed there for trial of faith where it is; and for discovery of those that have none…” This suggests it may simply be the trials we meet on our pilgrimage. If they are before the House Beautiful, then it may be best to view the lions as trials and persecutions believers encounter in their endeavors to attend the church.

HOUSE BEAUTIFUL (45)

This represents the church. Cheever says, “It is well to remark here that the House Beautiful stands beside the road; it does not cross it, so as to make the strait and narrow way run through it, so as that there is no possibility of continuing in that way without passing through it.”[1] He takes this to be Bunyan’s way of saying that the Visible Church is not necessary to salvation. Several other comments are offered. Perhaps Cheever’s point is not entirely accurate. Whatever he should draw from this imagery, the church is necessary (though not absolutely in the Roman Catholic sense). She is the body of Christ and no man is ordinarily saved outside of the visible church. Yet, his point that “he staid not there for pleasure; that was not the end of the journey, nor the object of it” (p. 307) is worthy of note.

ROLL (45)

“For this Roll was the assurance of his life, and acceptance at the desired Haven.”  (45) He also calls it his “Evidence” (47) — “but that in my sleep I lost my Evidence…” Assurance can be lost and regained. It is often lost when we sin (as in this case).

SHAME AND DETESTATION (50)

“Those who stood by and observed Prudence wondered at her delight in the sad discourse on which the pilgrim now entered. But she had her own reasons for her delight in this particular kind of discourse, and it was seldom that she lighted on a pilgrim who both understood her questions and responded to them as did this man now sitting beside her. Now, my brethren, all parable apart, is that your religious experience? Are you full of shame and detestation at your inward cogitations? Are you tormented, enslaved, and downright cursed with your own evil thoughts?” (Whyte, Bunyan Characters, First Series, 152-153)

GOLDEN HOURS (50)

“The golden hours, (fleeting and precious,) are earnests of the everlasting holy felicity of heaven.” (Thomas Scott, 71)

ARMORY (54)

“The following allusions in the scriptural history, which have a peculiar propriety in a allegory, intimates that the means of grace are made effectual by the power of God, which we should depend on, in implicit obedience to his appointments.” (Thomas Scott, 76) Also note, there is no armor on our backs (which we will see on p. 55).


[1] George B. Cheever, Lectures on the Pilgrim’s Progress (New York: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1891?), 306.

Amillennialism

Amillennialism[1]

Introduction

That there are at least four major views to the end times (eschatology) question should cause us to pause. As mentioned before, all these views teach Christ’s personal return, the resurrection of every person, the judgment of all men, the eternal blessedness of the redeemed, and the everlasting punishment of the wicked. In these matters, we are all in agreement. An illustration will reveal where the differences might lie. We all know that the USA defeated the Taliban in Afghanistan and ousted Saddam Hussein in Iraq. On those major issues, all are in agreement. However, the account of those events may differ somewhat, depending on one’s political view. In addition, the purpose and reason for those events are under dispute. Similarly, all genuine Christians agree on the above items, but many of us disagree on how it will all come about.

Various Millennial Views

Our study on the rapture and an earlier overview of the question of Israel and the Church have given us an adequate survey of the Dispensational Premillennial position. The other three positions include Classic (or “Historic”) Premillennialism, Postmillennialism, and Amillennialism. The key distinctive element to Classical Premillennialism is its emphasis on a literal millennial reign. They believe Christ will come before the millennium. Many things will happen before Christ’s coming (evangelization of the nations, the great tribulation, apostasy and rebellion, and the appearance of the a personal antichrist).  It is a position maintained (though some details may differ) by some of the early church fathers (Justin Martyr, Ireneaus, Hippolytus, and Lactantius) and some in the Reformation and Puritan centuries.[2] Both The Augsburg Confession (1530, article 17) and the Second Helvetic Confession (11:14) of 1566  denounce a form of premillennialism (they believed that old Jewish beliefs were being resurrected). Most premillennialists were Anabaptists (e.g., Thomas Müntzer) or part of the radical wing of the Reformation movement.[3] Perhaps the most modern exponent would be George E. Ladd and the CRC church historian at Calvin Seminary, Dr. H. Kromminga (also, the Bible Presbyterian Church).

Postmillennialists include Loraine Boettner and most Theonomists. These men believe that Christ will return after the millennium. The thousand years is not an exact number for them but rather represents a lengthy period of time where the gospel will penetrate the world and where God’s word through His Spirit will subdue a large majority of the people on earth. As a result, much peace and good will come of this; nations will work together, and there will be a long span of spiritual prosperity (maybe longer than one thousand years). “This does not mean that there ever will be a time on this earth when every person will be a Christian, or that all sin will be abolished. But it does mean that evil in all its many forms eventually will be reduced to negligible proportions, that Christian principles will be the rule, not the exception, and that Christ will return to a truly Christianized world.”[4]

No one view is entirely satisfactory. Whereas in many other things, we can be dogmatic, in this, we must be tentative. However, that does not mean we cannot draw conclusions. We believe that the amillennial view is the most consistent and scriptural position. Ever since Augustine, many Christians have believed that the millennial reference depicts Christ’s present reign. The reference therefore is symbolic of Christ’s present heavenly reign until His final return. Crassly put, we are in the millennium right now because Christ reigns with power from on high. “The so called ‘signs of the times’ have been present in the world from the time of Christ’s first coming, but they will come to a more intensified, final manifestation just before his Second Coming. The amillennialist therefore expects the bringing of the gospel to all nations and the conversion of the fullness of Israel to be completed before Christ’s return. He also looks for an intensified form of tribulation and apostasy as well as for the appearance of a personal antichrist before the Second Coming.”[5]

Scriptural Defense

Before we can interpret Revelation 20, we need to see some of the other passages that will have a bearing on our overall interpretation.  The Book of Revelation was not written in a vacuum. Christ utilized the apocalyptic imagery of the OT when He revealed Himself to John in the Book of Revelation.

Daniel

Daniel gives us an important insight into the reign of God. Israel had been exiled and her own national sovereignty was taken away. Did God cease to rule since His own people failed? Of course not.

In Daniel 2, we are given Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (vv. 21ff.). The ability to interpret this dream was what set Daniel off from the rest of the wise counselors in Babylon. In it, Daniel speaks of four kingdoms. Every evangelical commentator has interpreted these four kingdoms to be a reference to Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece and then Rome. Also, every evangelical commentator takes the reference to the rock (vv. 44-45) to be Christ and His rule. Dispensationalists say that it can only be fulfilled if he rules from Jerusalem and is “literal.” So, they place this after the rapture and the great tribulation. But, the rock crushes Rome and all the previous kingdoms. The kingdom therefore is established by Christ’s earthly ministry, namely, by his life, death and resurrection, at His first coming. Dispensationalists read the prophecy like a Jew and expect a national hope—we must read the prophecy as it has been fulfilled in the NT through Christ.  Let us look at the NT evidence that Christ’s kingdom was established. Continue reading

John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, A Study Guide, Lesson 2

STUDY SESSION 2

Introduction (pp. 27-41)

Christian meets Goodwill and the Interpreter in this section. In addition, he will cast off his burdens. He has already been misled by Mr. Worldly-wise and will meet someone who will give him better counsel. In a sense, that is what this section is all about, namely, we should receive good instruction in our Christian walk. Bad counsel can lead to the “Slough of Despond” so we should heed godly warnings and instructions.

 

Readers

Goodwill (27)

Christian (27)

Interpreter (29)

Man in an Iron Cage (only 34-5)

Man rising out of Bed (35)

Simple, Sloth, & Presumption (39- very brief)

Formalist (39)

Hypocrisie (39)

 

Vocabulary

Dives (32) = rich man (Latin divitiae)

amity (32) = a friendly relationship (Latin amicus)

Professor (34) = one who professes to be a Christian. Puritans usually used the word negatively.

Garner (36) = granary or grain bin

Fatt (39) = this is apparently a proverb, “every tub”, ergo, “everyone must look after himself” (296)

tro (40) = trow (believe, think)

 

Questions (pp. 27-41)

Page #

27        What do you think the arrows represented? (cf. Eph. 6:16)[1]

28        Good Will’s words “…is the coelestial Glory of so small esteem with him, that he counteth it not worth running the hazards of a few difficulties to obtain it?” are important. Isn’t this way reasoning applicable to all who forsake the faith?

29        Note, he went through the wicket gate. Why was the burden not lifted? Good or bad? (see Observations & Notes on “Burden Loosed” or see question on p. 37 below)

30        Interpreter explains the picture. Who do you think the Interpreter represents? [see Observations & Notes]

30        Explain what Interpreter means when he says, “…is the only Man, whom the Lord of the Place…hath Authorized, to be thy Guide in all difficult places thou mayest meet with in the way…”[2]

30-1     Dust in the Parlor represents original sin. How does the “law” give strength to sin?

31-2     One room leads Christian to “two little Children” named Patience and Passion. What does “Passion” represent and is it an apt name?[3] Why do you think Passion “laughed Patience to scorn”? Why is Patience better off? (see Luke 16:19ff.)

32-3     “Fire burning against a Wall” — what role does the devil play in this picture? Who is the man behind the wall and explain the image? What is the point of the man behind the wall?[4]

33        The story of the “Palace” should be simple to understand. What does it mean?

34        “Man in an Iron Cage” How did he become a “Man of Despair”? Can this happen? Explain his answer to the question, “Is there no hope but you must be kept in this Iron Cage of Despair.”

35-6     A man rose from his bed and was frightened of what he saw. What did he see that made him afraid? Are Christians supposed to live in fear like this?

37        Christian came to the Cross and “his burden loosed from off his Shoulders.”  What is the meaning of this? (see margin) What does it mean when he says that the sight of the Cross “should thus ease him of his burden”? Does this happen once, often, daily, etc. to a believer? (see Observations & Notes on “Burden Loosed”)

39        Simple, Sloth, and Presumption resist Christian’s warnings. Do you know of anyone like one of these? Explain each one.

40        Formality and Hypocrisie were convinced that the way they came in was tolerable. They argued, “[W]hat’s matter which way we get in? if we are in, we are in…” Is there another way of saying this same thing (as said in our generation)? Explain their discussion over the “Coat” (40).

 

Observations & Notes

Goodwill (27)

Goodwill represents the grace of God and/or the Lord Himself. On p. 27 we read: “So when Christian was stepping in, the other gave him a pull…” “The pull given by Goodwill makes it clear: it is God—not man—who opens the gate and pulls the sinner in. Just as Goodwill was the only one who could open the gate, so God alone can bring the sinner into the covenant of grace. It is true that the sinner must knock and must step in, but the faith and repentance that are required of the sinner are the gifts of God.” (Calhoun, 51)

However, Goodwill could simply be the growing conviction of the Lord’s goodness to him. A believer must be persuaded of the Lord’s goodwill towards him or he will despair. This encounter may be the growing conviction of Christian that God is merciful and gracious to the broken hearted. Nonetheless, Goodwill is most likely a reference to Christ (“I am willing with all my heart, said he” 27).

 

Interpreter (30)

Some “interpreters” of Bunyan’s work are divided. Some take him to be the Holy Spirit (Maureen Bradley, 21; Calhoun, 54) while other believers take him to be a faithful preacher of the Word of God (the editor of the edition of the book we’re studying takes it to be Bunyan’s faithful preacher, see p. 295). Alexander Whyte says that “every minister of the gospel is an interpreter, and every evangelical church is an interpreter’s house…” (Whyte, Bunyan Characters, First Series, 76) On the other hand, Bunyan does talk about the need for “illumination” (p. 29) as allegorized by the “Candle.” The Interpreter seems to illumine, just like the Holy Spirit. As he explains the various scenes, he gives illumination. We cannot be absolutely certain.

 

The Man in the Iron Cage (34-35)

This episode is considered by some to be Bunyan’s darkest picture. What exactly is the point? Most take this to be someone like Francis Spira (lived in the 1500s).[5] He was a lawyer in Italy who became one of the Protestants. However, later on he recanted and went back to the Catholic church. This apostasy is recounted in A Relation of the Fearful Estate of Francis Spira. He was remorseful but found no hope. There is another example with which Bunyan was very familiar. One of his own friend in Bedford (John Child) also died hopeless like Spira. John Child was a Baptist minister who in great fear of persecution conformed to the Church of England. John Child ended up taking his own life on Oct. 15, 1684.

Each reference to Spira is used as an example of someone who was in an irrecoverable condition. In Pilgrim’s Progress he says, “I am now a Man of Despair, and am shut up in it, as in this Iron Cage. I cannot get out; O now I cannot.” In his Grace Abounding, Bunyan himself believed that he had come to this same predicament. On reading of Spira, he feared greatly and almost despaired.

Here is the Poem that comes with the Spira story. It introduces the frightening story.

Here see a soul that’s all despair; a man

All hell; a spirit all wounds; who can

A wound spirit bear?

Reader, would’st see, what may you never feel

Despair, racks, torments, whips of burning steel!

Behold, the man’s the furnace, in whose heart

Sin hath created hell; O in each part

What flames appear:

His thoughts all stings; words, swords;

Brimstone his breath;

His eyes flames; wishes curses, life a death;

A thousand deaths live in him, he not dead;

A breathing corpse in living, scalding lead.[6]

What this man in the cage represents are those men and women who have been sealed in their unbelief. In recounting this, Christian described this man in the cage to Piety as “the Man [who] had sinned himself quite out of hopes of Gods mercy” (p. 49). Bunyan says in another place, “The day of grace ends with some men before God takes them out of this world.”[7] See Ex. 9:12, 14; Deut. 29:18-19; 1 Sam. 28:4-6; Is. 66:4; Rom. 1:28-31; 2:3-5; Eph. 4:18-19; 2 Th. 2:10-12; 1 Tim. 4:2; Heb. 6:4-6 and Jude 5, 6, 13. Thomas Scott says, “But we should leave the doom of apparent apostates to God; and improve [i.e. make use of] their example, as a warning to ourselves and others, not to venture one step in so dangerous a path.”[8]

Let us remember Esau who “found no place for repentance, though he sought it with tears” (Heb. 12:17). Though we cannot determine who has fallen into this sad condition, we should take it to heart and not provoke God by our hard-heartedness. Heed Interpreter’s warning: “Let this mans misery be remembered by thee, and be an everlasting caution to thee.” (35)

 

Burden Loosed (37)

Remember, he was told “As to the burden, be content to bear it, until thou comest to the place of Deliverance; for there it will fall form thy back it self.” (29) Why did he bear it up to this time? Horner’s explanation is helpful here:

Having been directed by Good-will (Jesus Christ), burdened Christian arrives at the House of Interpreter (the Holy Spirit) for edification, in parallel with John 15:26. Here this new believer portrays Bunyan who, though still burdened, was likewise edified for his journey through the profitable instruction of Pastor John Gifford. So in Grace Abounding we are told, ‘At this time, also, I sat under the ministry of holy Mr. Gifford, whose doctrine, by God’s grace, was much for my stability.’ It is significant that the first room in Interpreter’s house displays a portrait of the godly pastor, as epitomized by Gifford, thus following very closely…the sequence of events described in Grace Abounding. For Christian, the burden remains while the balm of instruction is applied; and so he continues to struggle with temptation, troubling questions and fluctuations between hope and fear; and so it was the case with Bunyan until the cross came into clear view.

…Here Christian, like Bunyan as a believer who has at last come into a state of enlightenment, stability  and assurance, gains a much clearer understanding of the atonement, with all its attendant benefits, and especially that of the saving substitutionary atonement of Jesus Christ. Thus the burden of doubt falls away…Hence it would appear that Bunyan incorporates his own testimony into the narrative of The Pilgrim’s Progress as a help to those who, like himself, have needlessly floundered. …” (Horner, 137-138)

Remember, Christian passed through the Wicket Gate, the Interpreter’s House, and then the Place of Deliverance. Not all Christians experience it that way and one need not necessarily go through the same sequence. One writer says, “Bunyan symbolically intimated that in his opinion a longer or shorter period of time will elapse between coming to Christ and possessing the comfort and assurance that one’s sins are forgiven.” (Pieter de Vries cited in Horner, 140)


[1] Spurgeon says, “Bunyan alludes to the fact that, when souls are just upon the verge of salvation, they are usually assailed by the most violent temptations. …They are seeking the Saviour; they have begun to pray; they are anxious to believe on the Lord Jesus Christ; yet they are meeting with difficulties such as they never knew before, and they are almost at their wits’ end.” (Pictures from Pilgrim’s Progress, 67)

[2] Note, Christian has already met him, Evangelist.

[3] “…they must have all their good things now, they cannot stay till next Year; that is, until the next World, for their Portion of good.” (31)

[4] Note, “…that it is hard for the tempted to see how this work of Grace is maintained in the soul” (33).

[5] The dagger notation to this Oxford edition indicates this (p. 296). Bunyan refers to Spira at least five times in the course of his writings. For a superb overview of Spira and Bunyan, see Barry Horner, John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress: Themes and Issues (Auburn, MA: Evangelical Press, 2003), 223-235.

[6] Cited in Horner, Themes and Issues, 230.

[7] Bunynan, Works (Offor ed.), 3:579.

[8] Bunyan, The Pilgrim’s Progress…, with original notes by Thomas Scott (Hartford: Silas Andrus, 1830), 53.

Proverbs 2

Proverbs 2:1-22

Verses 1-5 encourages us to seek wisdom and vv. 5-9 is the answer. Again the theme is hungering for wisdom. Though this may be directed to the young, it pertains to all of us. The father here instructs his son to heed his counsel. It is wisdom beckoning us to heed God’s word. The two work together.

 

2:1-4 — 1 My son, if you receive my words and treasure up my commandments with you, 2 making your ear attentive to wisdom and inclining your heart to understanding; 3 yes, if you call out for insight and raise your voice for understanding, 4 if you seek it like silver and search for it as for hidden treasures,

This is taken to be the father instructing his son to follow the path of wisdom (cf. Waltke). That is probably true. It is also wisdom speaking through the father instructing us to follow her path of wisdom.

Derek Kidner makes an insightful observation. Whereas wisdom clamored to be heard in 1:20, now the pupil must clamor for her.  Wisdom is not calling for us to speculate in the dark. In verse 1, wisdom instructs us to receive her words and treasure [store up] her commands.

Verse 2 could be translated as “by making your ear attentive…” (cf. Waltke, 213 n.1), that is, we receive and treasure God’s word by making our ear attentive to wisdom and inclining our heart to understand. The individual’s heart must be disposed or inclined toward wisdom. The person cannot merely tolerate God’s Word or simply register its existence as if that is the only thing God requires.

Verses 3-4 expand upon the same point. Ardent efforts are enjoined; resolute pursuits are called upon. William Arnot aptly stated, “The zeal of Mammon’s worshippers rebukes the servants of the living God.” We have read of many men and families who ventured into the West to find Gold. Several lost their lives in the pursuit of fleeting treasure. Juan Ponce de León searched for the rumored fountain of youth in the Bahamas (ended in Florida); Hernán Cortés burned his ships in Mexico so as to induce his soldiers to be committed to his cause. People give themselves to their gods and causes. God calls us to desire his wisdom as silver and hidden treasure (she is worth more, 3:14 and 16:16, “How much better to get wisdom than gold! To get understanding is to be chosen rather than silver.”).

Charles Bridges believes these descriptions are exhibited in our prayers. Our ardent prayers manifest such characteristics. “Earthly wisdom is gained by study; heavenly wisdom by prayer. Study may form a Biblical scholar; prayer puts the heart under a heavenly tutorage, and therefore forms the wise and spiritual Christian.” (Bridges, 14) Furthermore, because wisdom is founded on receiving God’s word and commands, this earnest searching must be exhibited in our study of God’s Word.

 

2:5-9 —5 then you will understand the fear of the LORD and find the knowledge of God. 6 For the LORD gives wisdom; from his mouth come knowledge and understanding; 7 he stores up sound wisdom for the upright; he is a shield to those who walk in integrity, 8 guarding the paths of justice and watching over the way of his saints. 9 Then you will understand righteousness and justice and equity, every good path;

If we earnestly clamor for this heavenly wisdom, then we will find: “you will understand the fear of the LORD and find the knowledge of God.” This is a remarkable statement because fearing the Lord is the beginning of wisdom and we learn that an earnest searching after God’s wisdom will help us to rightly fear God and know Him. This understanding of God comes by receiving His Word.

Furthermore, we are told that God is the one who gives this wisdom, knowledge of Himself, an understanding of His ways. Wisdom is not something plucked by human effort; mere effort cannot arrest it. It is something God gives; He gives “sound wisdom” to the upright. Wisdom is not imparted to the unrighteous but those who receive His word and live uprightly. “Because the LORD alone has access to wisdom (Job 28:12-28) and gave it birth from his very being (Prov. 8:22-24), he alone gives wisdom (cf. Dan. 2:21-22).” (Waltke) George Lawson says, “It is plain that those who employ themselves in the diligent pursuit of wisdom, have been already blessed with some degree of true knowledge; for how could they value so highly that with which they were altogether unacquainted? He is already wise, who prefers wisdom to every earthly object; and he shall be wise still, for to him that hath shall be given, and he shall have more abundantly.” (Lawson, 31)

Verses 7-8 pile up the practical and moral benefits of God’s wisdom. God will protect those whom He blesses. “God’s protection is not a reward extraneous to the knowledge, but rather a consequence intrinsic to it.” (cited in Waltke) Wisdom and uprightness, integrity, and saintliness go together. Wisdom is not abstract but exhibits or demonstrates itself by godly characteristics. God will protect us through this difficult dark world.

Verse 9 reveals the implications this wisdom will have on the righteous. As God gives us wisdom (v. 5) and protects us (vv. 7, 8), we can begin to understand the proper paths in life, that is, “righteousness and justice and equity.” That is, “wisdom brings ethical enlightenment” (Longman).  “The internalized divine wisdom and knowledge enable the disciple to discern the right, just, and fair that the LORD commits himself to protect.” (Waltke)

This is what we need in this world— what is the proper path? How do we discern which way to go? With so many choices, we need to be able to understand “every good path.” God promises us that if we receive His words and treasure his commandments by inclining ourselves to better know and apply them, he will enable us to walk in the good path. This what wisdom promise.

 

2:10-15 — 10 for wisdom will come into your heart, and knowledge will be pleasant to your soul; 11 discretion will watch over you, understanding will guard you, 12 delivering you from the way of evil, from men of perverted speech, 13 who forsake the paths of uprightness to walk in the ways of darkness, 14 who rejoice in doing evil and delight in the perverseness of evil, 15 men whose paths are crooked, and who are devious in their ways.

These verses expand upon the point begun in v. 9. God’s gift of wisdom will aid us and God’s wisdom will sit well within us — “pleasant to your souls.” (v. 10) That is, God’s saints love God’s ways and His ways are not swallowed like bitter medicine but embraced as something pleasant.

God’s wisdom will become a part of us and it will help us. “The process is that wisdom and knowledge, when they become your own way of thinking, and your acquired taste (10), will make the talk and interests of evil men alien to you (12-15).” (Kidner) The impact of this wisdom leads us to take notice of and forsake the paths of unrighteousness. That is, saints will see the paths to be clear; they will immediately avoid those paths that are crooked. One of the effects is that we won’t fall into the wrong crowd or follow those who forsake the Lord. “The protection takes the form of extrication, removal from association with a certain type of person.” (Longman) Remember, the choice is clear and simple to the righteous because they have cried out to God for wisdom and have treasured His commandments. But that is not the case with everyone.

Some find the choice difficult. The way of evil men seems promising, at times pleasant, and some times praiseworthy. It appears that way to those who do not have God’s wisdom. Therefore, those who fall into bad company are not mere victims. Their wayward naïve lifestyle has led them to the foolish paths they chose; they have, as it were, sown the seeds of their own destruction. They did not seek wisdom and in times of critical choices, they fell into “the way of evil.” May God keep us from “men of perverted speech.”

Shunning evil and evil men does not mean we are to avoid unbelievers (cf. 1Cor. 5:10). We must consider our own strengths and weaknesses in these matters. Some are easily led astray by the influence of one person while others can withstand a thousand. Either way, each saint must discern what is right and follow it for the Lord’s sake. May the Lord preserve us.

 

2:16-19 — 16 So you will be delivered from the forbidden woman, from the adulteress with her smooth words, 17 who forsakes the companion of her youth and forgets the covenant of her God; 18 for her house sinks down to death, and her paths to the departed; 19 none who go to her come back, nor do they regain the paths of life.

Part of wisdom’s protection is from sexual sins. There are those men and women who will lead the young one astray into immorality. Here is something we often overlook. We tend to consider falling into immorality as a matter of weak strength, lack of will, strong overpowering desires, etc. But how did some one come to this? Proverbs teaches us that preservation from these sins is rooted in our love of wisdom, of God, and in what we treasure. There are perverse men and women who will seduce us — the righteous are protected from them. Sexual sins are not unrelated to our moral constitution and wisdom — the two are related. Lack wisdom and we can even fall into these sins. Possess wisdom as the Lord gives and He will preserve us from them. Proverbs 22:14 says, “The mouth of an adulteress is a deep pit; He who is cursed of the LORD will fall into it.”

Hubbard is therefore very correct: “What we have, then, in verses 16-20 is not an isolated warning about fornication or adultery but a further description of wisdom’s ability to serve as shield and guard (vv. 7-8) — ‘to deliver’ (v. 16) — in life’s temptation. Wisdom’s power is the chief subject, not the wanton’s wiles.” (Hubbard) Some 65 verses are given to this immoral woman. It will be the subject of ch. 5-7. “This understanding and prudence is an antidote against the poisonous infection of evil men and strange women.” (Lawson, 38)

With the growing number of immoral places (the so called “adult entertainment” centers or “gentlemen’s clubs” along with myriads of immoral facilities) in our country and around the world, we must wonder if the Lord is not judging our land. Surely this is a curse upon our neighborhood and nation.

It would not be stretching the meaning of the text to suggest that Solomon was also alluding to religious compromise. Adultery serves as analogy to spiritual adultery. We need protection from both.

 

2:20-22 — 20 So you will walk in the way of the good and keep to the paths of the righteous. 21 For the upright will inhabit the land, and those with integrity will remain in it, 22 but the wicked will be cut off from the land, and the treacherous will be rooted out of it.

As God’s wisdom protects us from evil men and wicked women, so it enables us to walk with the righteous. The final result of wisdom’s protection is that we will live to inhabit the land and not be cut off prematurely. “Failure to heed wisdom’s call leads either to premature death or to a life so void of happiness as to be a living death in which none of the God-given blessing of the ‘earth’… is available to lend any joy or meaning to life.” (Hubbard) [The picture is concrete and envisions a land without the wicked. The fullness of this vision is accomplished when Christ comes back and establishes the New Heaven and Earth..] “Death is a kind messenger sent to the righteous by their heavenly Father, calling them to the possession of their eternal inheritance; to the wicked it is a messenger of wrath, summoning them to the abodes of misery.” (Lawson)

 

Proverbs 1:20-33

Proverbs 1:20-33

1:20-21 — Wisdom cries aloud in the street, in the markets she raises her voice; at the head of the noisy streets she cries out; at the entrance of the city gates she speaks:

Wisdom is personified and she goes out to the street, into the markets and cries out at the entrance of the city gates. The imagery is like a father (since elders sat at the gates) making every effort to reach the uncommitted masses with his teachings (cf. Waltke). One writer said, “Lady Wisdom is no gentle persuader. She shouts, pleads, scolds, reasons, threatens, warns, and even laughs (see vv. 24-33). Pulpit bashing and hell-fire preaching if ever there were! All quite unladylike; and nowadays also quite unfashionable, even frowned upon.” (cited in Waltke, 202)

Some commentators have likened this to Jesus Himself who was in the streets and fields preaching (cf. Bridges, Arnot). He is wisdom itself — “The eternal Son of God is not only wisdom in himself, He is ‘made unto us wisdom.’” (Arnot) Regarding the setting, Perowne says, “Just within the gate of an oriental city was the principal square, or open space, where public business was transacted and courts were held.”

 

1:22 — How long, O simple ones, will you love being simple? How long will scoffers delight in their scoffing and fools hate knowledge?

The phrase “How long…”  is a rhetorical question which assumes a statement. “It is not a true question but an implied statement: you have had long enough; you should have answer my call by now.” (Hubbard) It may assume the rejection of parental counsel (cf. Waltke).

The “simple ones” are committing themselves to simplicity. They are the unwary (Perowne), the young and naïve (Hubbard), the gullible (Waltke) etc. “But instead of embracing the teaching, the fledgling apostates love being gullible.” (Waltke) They love something that will destroy them; they edge closer to outright rebellion. “Her problem with these three groups of people is that they each relish their present state of ignorance. They not only tolerate it but also embrace it wholeheartedly, as communicated by the verbs ‘love’ …and ‘hold dear’ [delight]. “ (Longman)

So the gullible, the simple ones are mentioned with the scoffers and fools. The gullible can easily become like them. They hate knowledge and scoff at wisdom. Of the three, the simple ones are the most likely to heed the call; the mockers are the most hardened of the three.

It is important to note that Wisdom mentions the mockers and fools to show where they stand. This contrast is important for the simple ones. They must see that there are those who oppose wisdom and must make a decision. Will the simple be like the mockers and fools? Will she also mock? Will she also hate knowledge? The options are there but what will she do?

 

§1. There are people who have yet to choose the right path. They flirt with mischief and disaster; they are enamored with the world; they are not committed to the way of gospel holiness. They keep their options open.

§2. Solomon says that they “love” simplicity. Some simply do not want to “grow up” and become wise and discerning. Life is serious and we need what wisdom offers but the simple like the life of indolence and leisure — they do not wish to be serious but love what is naïve and simple, they love to be careless.

 

1:23 — If you turn at my reproof, behold, I will pour out my spirit to you; I will make my words known to you.

Even with this tendency to love simplicity, wisdom still beckons and promises. The gullible can still turn, he can still repent (the word can be translated as turn back or repent) and heed the reproof. “If they turn back, their action will in itself imply their repentance, for they will have humbled themselves and acknowledged that Wisdom is right and that they have been in the wrong in nursing their love to be careless and free of her discipline.” (Waltke)

Wisdom does not apologize for rebuking, for her reproof. She rebukes with a promise, namely, she will pour our her spirit on the simple ones (similar language to Joel 2:28) — “and thus be empowered to carry out the implications of the turning and to know more fully what wisdom wants to teach them” (Hubbard)

 

§1. Part of wisdom is to recognize that one had no wisdom and therefore has to turn back, to repent, of his ways. It does us no good to pretend we had not erred. Wisdom admits it walked in the way of folly.

§2. “Note the close connection between ‘spirit’ and ‘words’ — a connection sound theology has always made in refusing to choose one above the other or to play them against each other.” (Hubbard)

 

1:24-27 — Because I have called and you refused to listen, have stretched out my hand and no one has heeded, because you have ignored all my counsel and would have none of my reproof, I also will laugh at your calamity; I will mock when terror strikes you, when terror strikes you like a storm and your calamity comes like a whirlwind, when distress and anguish come upon you.

The invitation to turn and repent is short; the warnings against not turning are longer. Chapter 8 develops the promises and benefits of yielding to wisdom. What have the simple ones done? They have “refused to listen” and have not “heeded”; they have “ignored” Wisdom’s counsel and “would have none of my reproof.” Their choice was deliberate. The decision was thorough and resolute. The tender promises will no longer be heard. They will hear the righteous laughter of Wisdom. “Truth has a harsh edge, and Wisdom does not dull it.” (Waltke)

This may strike us as being overly harsh. Yet, this sarcasm is righteous. One does not have unlimited opportunities. Remember, “TODAY is the day of salvation…” “The ask-receive, seek-find pattern has time limits built into it in both Testaments (Isa. 55;6; Matt. 7:7).” (Hubbard) [2 Corinthians 6:2 For he says, “In a favorable time I listened to you, and in a day of salvation I have helped you.” Behold, now is the favorable time; behold, now is the day of salvation. Isaiah 55:6 “Seek the LORD while he may be found; call upon him while he is near; Matthew 7:7 “Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you.]

Waltke says, “Wisdom does not laugh at disaster, but at the triumph of what is right over what is wrong when your disaster happens…” (Waltke, 207) That is, Wisdom rejoices over God’s righteous judgment on evil (cf. Hubbard denies God’s active role in this — it is “the order coded by God into the creation”). Waltke also adds, “Wisdom rejoices in turning the present upside-down world rightside up, when wisdom overturns folly, righteousness outs wickedness, knowledge overcomes ignorance, humility topples pride, and life swallows up death.” (Waltke)

Longman explains, “Woman Wisdom comes across in this speech as angry and unyielding. She shows no mercy to those who come to their senses in the midst of the punishment that their foolish action brings on them. However, the intention of this speech is to spur present action. She does not want them to wait till they are in the midst of their suffering, but she wants them to turn to her right away to avoid the pain.”

 

1:28-31 — Then they will call upon me, but I will not answer; they will seek me diligently but will not find me. Because they hated knowledge and did not choose the fear of the LORD, would have none of my counsel and despised all my reproof, therefore they shall eat the fruit of their way, and have their fill of their own devices.

If Wisdom’s laughter seems harsh, then these verses almost seem incomprehensible. Wisdom will be vindicated; time will run out and her ways will be shown to be right. One does not have endless opportunities to heed wisdom; choices made can lead to death unless the person repents. It is too late to turn when the consequences of folly come upon the simple. What they did to her, she will do to them. They did not heed her but despised her; they mocked her and hated her counsel. Now the table has turned on them —“they shall eat the fruit of their way, and have their fill of their own devices.” Bridges says, “Prayer, once omnipotent, will then be powerless.” (Bridges, 11)

It must be noted that the refusal in question is one that is substantive and resolute. The mocker is the one who chose not to fear the Lord and “would have none my counsel and despised all my reproof.” The person in question is not the one who has made some foolish choices and has wandered off occasionally. The person envisioned in these verses is the one who has consciously and repeatedly refused wisdom. Such a person will receive his just recompense (see §2). He is the one who continually sinned in time who will fall into hell in eternity. God has not ceased to be gracious while we live nor does He desire our death (Ezekiel 18:23, Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked, declares the Lord GOD, and not rather that he should turn from his way and live?) but his grace will not extend beyond the grave.

§1. In our evangelical situation, we tend to think of limitless opportunities. Everybody can always make a fresh start. So these words in Proverbs seem to be very unevangelical. God is not always going to extend His mercy — He is not merciful forever. Hell is the monument of God’s righteousness and man’s rebellion. So, we must reckon with the consequences of our actions.

§2. Some may say that we have all acted as this fool. So how long and how often can we refuse God before He will turn deaf to us? God is not obligated to hear any of us. The question assumes that God is obligated to be gracious to us at every turn. He is not. He extends mercy and pleads through His Word. But if He chooses to turn us over to our evil passion and consign us to our wicked ways, then we have only ourselves to blame. These verses are given as a warning. We must not entertain the notion that we can safely sin and safely resist God. If fear of the future judgment causes us to be wise and turn to the Lord, then for that we thank God. If the love of God and His goodness woo us, then for that we also thank Him. It has been prayed, “Save, Lord, by love or fear.”

     

    1:32-33 — For the simple are killed by their turning away, and the complacency of fools destroys them; but whoever listens to me will dwell secure and will be at ease, without dread of disaster.”

    The gullible turned away from Wisdom (God) and fools are destroyed on account of their sense of security, prosperity, ease, etc. “So the complacency of fools (or dolts), due to their false feelings of security, causes them to fail to take precautions against the inevitable judgment bound up in their folly, and so it will destroy them…” (Waltke).

    On the other hand, the one who obeys or listens to Wisdom “will dwell secure and will be at ease, without dread of disaster.” It is in contrast to the fool. The fool thought he had this; he did not. The one who listened to Wisdom actually secured this.

     

    §1. “And, oh! be it remembered, that every inattention, every willful neglect, is a step towards this fearful apostasy. The word gradually becomes a burden, then a scorn.” (Bridges) Let us heed God’s Word.

    §2. The promises in v. 33 do not mean worldly security but true security in the Lord. We will dwell confident because our conscience is clear and because the Lord is near. We trust not in our wit or wisdom but in God’s Wisdom and Word.

     

    Proverbs 1:8-19

    Proverbs 1:8-19

    1:8-9 — 8 Hear, my son, your father’s instruction, and forsake not your mother’s teaching, 9 for they are a graceful garland for your head and pendants for your neck.

    The first thing Solomon teaches us in the path of wisdom is the call to heed parental instruction. This is very significant. One, it follows right after the introduction in which Solomon offers wisdom. This effectively makes it important because of its location. Two, after fearing God, wisdom calls us to accept instruction from our parents (contrary to a fool who despises wisdom and instruction, v. 7).

    Our culture worships all things young. Parents are tolerated at best; they are no longer important or necessary. The Bible on the other hand indicates that one of the first steps we are to take in order to be wise is to heed the instruction of parents. This is in accordance with the first commandment with a promise (Eph. 6:2; cf. 1Tim. 5:4). In hearing and not forsaking them, we will make us spiritually beautiful: “Obedience makes a person delightfully outstanding to others and gives one something to cherish and value for oneself.” (Hubbard)

    God is saying that the child (“my son”) must hear their fathers and must not forsake their mothers teaching or law (tr:îAT). God is telling the young not to forsake the instruction of the parents. “That both parents are mentioned is a tribute to the prominent role of Israel’s mothers. We find no similar reference to mother as teacher in Babylonian or Egyptian wisdom literature.” (Hubbard, 49)

    Verse 9 is the motivation. Waltke says these are “symbols of honor and life that can hardly be disregarded.” Furthermore, “they [the teachings] are the adornments; the adornments are not something future and extrinsic to them.…all children who obey their godly parents and embrace the teachings of this book wear the teachings as heroes wore ‘the great wreath.” (Waltke, 187-8)

    1. It assumes that parents instruct their children. George Lawson says, “It is here supposed that parents will instruct their children. They are monsters rather than parents, who do not love the fruit of their own bodies. Love will dispose persons to do all the good they can to the objects of it; and the best thing that can be done for children, is to teach them the fear of the Lord.” (p. 8)

    2. Unto what age should a child heed his parents’ advice? Bridges says, “Neither age nor rank gives any claim for exemption. Joseph — when ripe in years, the head of a family, and the first Lord in Egypt— bowed before his father’s feet. (Gen xlvi. 29; xlviii. 12.) Solomon, in the glory of his crown, forgot not the respect justly due to his mother. [cf. 1K. 2:19, 20; cf. also Esther 2:20] Nor were the crown upon his head, and the chain of gold about Joseph’s neck… so graceful as this ornament of filial humility.”

     

    1:10-14 — The first teaching of the parents is to avoid bad company. He is saying, Regard your parents and resist your peers. This scenario presents itself to everyone. Every young man or woman is confronted with peer pressure — with opportunities to run with a crowd against the parent’s judgment.  “The son’s allegiance to the family’s inherited worldview must be sharply delineated from that of the gang, who seek to draw him into their corruption.” (Waltke, 188)

    1:10 — My son, if sinners entice you, do not consent.

    Sinners in Proverbs are those who have already chosen the path of folly and sin. They love company and love to mislead. Their solicitations require acquiescence; the young son must consent, reply affirmatively, accept the invitation, etc. He may be misled but he is not misled against his will. “Eve consented, before she plucked the fruit; David, before he committed the act of sin (cf. Bridges). “If the temptation prevail, charge it not on God; no — nor on the devil. As the worst he can do, he can only tempt, he cannot force us, to sin. When he has plied us with his utmost power, and most subtle artifice, it is at the choice of our own will, whether we yield or no. (See Jam. i. 13-15)” (Bridges, 6)

     

    1:11-14 — 11 If they say, “Come with us, let us lie in wait for blood; let us ambush the innocent without reason; 12 like Sheol let us swallow them alive, and whole, like those who go down to the pit; 13 we shall find all precious goods, we shall fill our houses with plunder; 14 throw in your lot among us; we will all have one purse”-

    These are the sinners’ solicitations. Solomon is stating their words in their truest terms. They often come with deception: “Come, let us pick the pocket of some covetous miser, who has made himself rich by cunning, and scraped money together by such cowardly practices, as cannot expose him to the vengeance of the law.” (cf. Lawson) In other words, the words are often seductive and do not tell the whole story but the meaning is as the parents have stated it.

    Verse 13 reveals what will be gained. Riches will come but unlawfully. All sin and all seductions have some “good” in view, that is, one will gain something from it (satisfaction, pleasure, money, power, revenge, etc.) Verse 14 promises camaraderie — the person will be one of the gang with one purse. Easy money with promised friendship — who can resist? With money, the young man can get what he wants; with friends, he can use it in “happy” company. This is the way of the world. Waltke notes, “Sinners love wealth and use people; saints love people and use wealth to help others.” (193)

     

    1:15 — my son, do not walk in the way with them; hold back your foot from their paths,

    Parents warn against this sin. They portrayed the scenario; they stated the reasons of sinners and now they give their wise and hearty advice. Don’t go there. Stay away. Notice the words, parents are saying, “Don’t even go with them.” Some flatter themselves with the thought that they can resist; they want only to be with their companions — don’t walk with them. Waltke says “hold back your foot from their paths” means something like, “do not experiment with their addiction.” To walk in their paths is to deviate from paths of righteousness.

     

    1:16 — for their feet run to evil, and they make haste to shed blood.

    Lawson says, “Let us never forget the evil that is in sin. However men may dress it out in beautiful colours, it is the very quintessence of naughtiness.” These sinners are determined; they run and make haste to do these things; they are bent on wickedness.

    Parents need to instruct their children as to the true nature of certain ways. We must not downplay or overstate it but any path that deviates from God must be painted for what it is.

     

    1:17-18 — 17 For in vain is a net spread in the sight of any bird, 18 but these men lie in wait for their own blood; they set an ambush for their own lives.

    This gang of sinners promises much but are unaware of the very ambush they set for themselves. “No mention is made of pained consciences lives that stew in regret, heartache for friends and family, fear of being caught by authorities or betrayed by comrades who want the one purse for themselves, as did Judas in the apostolic company.” (Hubbard) In effect, these criminals are more stupid than birds! “But the lying-in-wait and the secret lurking which they described so vividly in verse 11 are the height of stupidity, since the sinners themselves are their own prey, the ultimate victims of their own feet; the very feet that run in the eagerness to work their evil crimes, violently hurrying to shed blood (v. 16) are maimed by their avid greed.” (Hubbard) Waltke notes how the father used their own words but has changed the victim. The phrases “for their own blood” and “for their own lives” are emphatic — they themselves are their own victims. “They look like they will pillage others, but in the outcome, it is they who will be pillaged.” (Longman)

     

    1:19 — Such are the ways of everyone who is greedy for unjust gain; it takes away the life of its possessors.

    This is the lesson of the parent’s instruction. Those who are so greedy for unjust gain, for illegal profit, unrighteous earnings, etc. will lose their souls. “The unjust gain clings to the criminal and eventually destroys him. Jesus draws a similar universal: ‘All who live by the sword will die by the sword’ (Matt. 26:52). In sum, this aphorism articulates the book’s fundamental concept of deed-consequence: sin begets harm (cf. Gal. 6:7).” (Waltke) “The sages are not against the pursuit of profits through honest, hard work. Many of the proverbs that follow actually encourage hard work with the intention of gaining profits.” (Longman)

    Koch is cited (by Waltke on p. 194) as saying, “A man’s deeds cling to him as it were, wrapping themselves around him in an invisible domain, which one day is transformed into a corresponding condition or state, and then recoils on the doer.” Waltke prefers the “deed-destiny nexus upheld by God, the knowledge of which is necessary for wisdom.”

    Proverbs 1:1-7

    Proverbs 1:1-7

    Hubbard gives a good overview of Proverbs: “The bulk of Proverbs divides into two major kinds of literature: instructive speeches, chapters 1-9; wisdom sayings, chapters 10-31. The speeches had as their main purpose to state every possible reason why wisdom should be valued and folly despised.” (43) Wisdom will beseech the reader to consider her ways. That will be the theme of chapters 1-9.

     

    1:1 — The proverbs of Solomon, son of David, king of Israel:

    Solomon was the last king of all Israel (966-926 BC). God has specially gifted Solomon for this task and these are his proverbs in addition to ones he collected into his book that were penned by other writers (30:1; 31:1). Hezekiah also played a role in conserving these proverbs (25:1, “These also are proverbs of Solomon which the men of Hezekiah king of Judah copied.”). We have all read of Solomon’s gift of wisdom. The following is a summary account of the fame of his wisdom (1K. 4:29-34):

    29 And God gave Solomon wisdom and understanding beyond measure, and breadth of mind like the sand on the seashore, 30 so that Solomon’s wisdom surpassed the wisdom of all the people of the east and all the wisdom of Egypt. 31 For he was wiser than all other men, wiser than Ethan the Ezrahite, and Heman, Calcol, and Darda, the sons of Mahol, and his fame was in all the surrounding nations. 32 He also spoke 3,000 proverbs, and his songs were 1,005. 33 He spoke of trees, from the cedar that is in Lebanon to the hyssop that grows out of the wall. He spoke also of beasts, and of birds, and of reptiles, and of fish. 34 And people of all nations came to hear the wisdom of Solomon, and from all the kings of the earth, who had heard of his wisdom.

    A proverb is a pithy wise saying about various things. It communicates lessons on life. These proverbs are ultimately rooted in God (see above; v. 7) and as a result, they can only make full sense in terms of God.

    1:2 — To know wisdom and instruction, to understand words of insight,

    These verses give us the purpose of this book. Each verse begins with “to” or “in order to” (Dl) except in v. 5. These proverbs were collected to know wisdom, etc. “To know” here means something more than mere mental knowledge acquisition. Given 2:1-4, it means personal internalization of wisdom and experiencing it in one’s life. Wisdom “is the broadest, most inclusive term available to depict the combination of observation, obedience, careful planning, prudent conduct, and sensitivity to God’s will that Israel’s wise treasured and taught…” (Hubbard, 45)

    This wisdom cannot be possessed without instruction, which is “the means of gaining it.” (Bridges, 2) This word “instruction” is used more than thirty times and the meaning includes correction and discipline.

    The person also cannot gain wisdom and instruction without an ability to understand. So Solomon says, “to understand words of insight” (NJKV, “to perceive the words of instruction”).  Wisdom and instruction need to be understood, perceived, or apprehended. It is the ability “to discern the differences at stake in the choices being weighed.” (Hubbard)

    1:3 — to receive instruction in wise dealing, in righteousness, justice, and equity

    The goal cannot be accomplished without accepting or receiving the instruction of wisdom or “instruction in wise dealing, in righteousness, justice, and equity.” The verb means to “take, grasp, seize (manually)” or “to take away with one,” etc. This “wise dealing” or “instruction in wisdom” is qualified as “in righteousness, justice, and equity.” It reveals the ethical nature of wisdom (because not all wisdom is good).  Adam and Eve thought disobedience would make them wise (“the tree was to be desired to make one wise” Gen. 3:6). That kind of craftiness, shrewdness, wisdom from below is not to be desired.

    1:4 — to give prudence to the simple, knowledge and discretion to the youth-

    The purpose of the book is to give prudence (hm’_r>[‘) to the simple, young, or naïve (‘to be inexperienced, be naïve”).[1] “The opposite of the simpleminded person is not the wise but the prudent person, and this is the characteristic that the wisdom of Proverbs seeks to provide to the naïve reader: The simpleminded person is in a much better place than a fool… or a mocker…. [because] they are teachable.” (Longman) The contrast seems to be between being gullible and being shrewd.

    The young needs knowledge and discretion (“caginess” Waltke, i.e. caution). That will be imparted by these proverbs. The youth are often considered naïve, gullible, simpleminded, etc. They are the target audience though not exclusively.

    1:5 — Let the wise hear and increase in learning, and the one who understands obtain guidance,

    Even the wise may still learn. “For a truly wise man is one, not who has attained, but who knows that he ‘has not attained,’ and is pressing onward to perfection.” (Bridges) The wise person “already participates in the wisdom program, but the introduction reminds the reader that even such an advance person can benefit from reflection on the instructions to follow.” (Longman) “Since by nature the wises hear and obey, each new hearing of the proverbs increases their corpus of knowledge…” (Waltke)

    KJV has “wise counsel”; it means “accurate guidance” or more literally, “sound steering of the right course.” (Hubbard) In hearing and receiving the proverbs, the instructions, the man of understanding will be able to rightly steer through life. He will see which way to go. It will be like having wise counselors always at his side guiding him. So this book is not just for the simple; it is for everyone. None of us are too wise for it! A child likes its simple and concrete advices; an adult is drawn to its profound simplicity and its realistic estimation of life.

    1:6 — to understand a proverb and a saying, the words of the wise and their riddles.

    Wisdom calls everyone to understand “a proverb, a saying, the words of the wise and their riddles.” “Riddles are teasing questions that are clear enough to give clues to their solution and cryptic enough to throw the careless off track…” (Hubbard)

    Riddles and sayings of the wise are not teachings per se. They demand insight and decision. “Ps. 78:1-2 labels that psalm’s recitation of Israel’s history not only as ‘teaching’ but also as ‘proverb’ and ‘riddle’ because it asks its audience to make an intuitive critical judgment of their own behavior in light of that history.” (Waltke) That is, when we give our attention to these things, we will begin to penetrate the seeming riddles and enigmas of these statements; the difficult sayings, the perplexing truths, etc. will begin to make sense to us.

    This means, after we begin to understand and incorporate these truths, these proverbs, these words of the wise, etc. will begin to work their way in and through our lives.

    1:7 — The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction.

    After giving us the purpose, the preamble, we are now given the foundation for the rest of the book. It is the “quintessential expression of the basic spiritual grammar for understanding the book.” (Waltke)

    The fear of the Lord is “foundational to knowledge, which here functions as a close synonym to wisdom. In this way, the book acknowledges the radically relational and theocentric nature of knowledge/wisdom.” (Longman) The “beginning” means something is the principal thing, the chief thing. God is the foundation of all knowledge, all wisdom. In Prov. 20:12, we read, “The hearing ear and the seeing eye, the LORD has made them both.” Fearing God “is the first thought that makes all other thoughts fall into place” (Longman).

    The opposite of this is found in fools. Fools do not fear God and as a result lack wisdom. They lack wisdom because they “despise wisdom and instruction.” Wisdom and instruction are the two things first offered to us in v. 2. Fools “willfully make the corrupt moral choice to refuse the sage’s moral teachings.” (Waltke)

    Have we not noticed this? The one who needs wisdom resists it while the one who is wise wants more. True wisdom begins and ends in God.


    [1] The “young” or naïve person was anyone up to the age of thirty. He was fully accountable at the age of twenty (cf. Num. 1:3, 18; 14:29; 26:2, 4) but was unable to serve in the temple until thirty years old (Num. 4:3). cf. Waltke, 178.